Feb 25, 2026
Understanding Cross-Border Fraud Disputes, CNP Transactions,
and Bulk Complaint Dynamics
About (Public Reporting)
Recent media coverage has reported unauthorised foreign
currency transactions — including USD and Brazilian Real — on multi-currency
prepaid forex cards associated with Yes Bank and distributed via BookMyForex.
Readers may refer to:
- Moneycontrol
https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/unauthorised-dollar-brazilian-real-transactions-hit-yes-bank-bookmyforex-forex-cards-data-breach-suspected-13843006.html - The
Economic Times
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/stocks/news/bookmyforex-suffers-a-major-data-breach-thousands-defrauded/articleshow/128766392.cms - Inc42
https://inc42.com/buzz/yes-bank-bookmyforex-cards-see-unauthorised-transactions-data-breach-suspected/
This article does not speculate on breach origin or assign
liability. It focuses strictly on the chargeback process in cross-border,
card-not-present scenarios involving multiple affected cardholders.
Because in digital finance, resilience depends not only on
prevention — but on how disputes are resolved.
1️⃣ International Merchant Transactions — What Changes?
When a disputed transaction originates outside India, the
pathway spans:
- Issuer
bank (India)
- Card
network (Visa / Mastercard)
- Foreign
acquiring bank
- Merchant
This introduces:
- Currency
conversion layers
- Cross-border
compliance checks
- Different
authentication environments
- Potentially
longer investigation timelines
Cross-border transactions do not prevent chargebacks, but they
can affect documentation and response time. Most such cases fall under fraud —
card-not-present (CNP) reason codes.
2️⃣ Card-Not-Present (CNP) Environment
The reported transactions appear to have occurred in a CNP
setting:
- No
physical swipe
- No
chip-and-PIN
- Online
merchant authorisation
In CNP disputes:
- Liability
often hinges on authentication strength.
- Absence
of strong customer authentication may support the cardholder’s claim.
- Repeated
patterns across users may indicate systemic exposure.
However, even in broader incidents:
Chargebacks typically require individual dispute registration
and customer confirmation.
They are not automatically initiated without formal reporting.
3️⃣ Bulk Complaints — Operational Reality
When multiple users report similar foreign transactions, banks
may:
- Flag
common merchant IDs
- Detect
geographic clustering
- Block
affected card ranges
- Initiate
forensic reviews
Yet operationally:
- Each
account requires a separate dispute reference.
- Each
cardholder must confirm unauthorised status.
- Documentation
remains individual.
Bulk context strengthens investigation — but the dispute
process remains structured and account-specific.
4️⃣ Who Raises the Chargeback?
Only the issuing bank — Yes Bank — can formally raise a
chargeback within the card network.
The distributor — BookMyForex — may assist operationally, but
the issuer controls:
- Dispute
coding
- Network
submission
- Provisional
credit decisions
- Final
resolution
Typical flow:
1. Cardholder
reports suspected fraud
2. Card is
blocked
3. Declaration
is submitted
4. Chargeback
is filed
In larger cases, banks may consider provisional credits during
investigation, but customers should not assume automatic reversals unless
officially communicated.
5️⃣ What Strengthens a Cross-Border Fraud Claim?
Common supporting factors include:
✔
Transaction occurred in a geography where the cardholder was not present
✔ No authentication triggered
✔ Similar fraud patterns across
users
✔ Rapid or repeated transaction
attempts
✔ Prompt reporting
Timelines matter. Network dispute windows typically range from
30 to 120 days depending on scheme rules.
Delay can complicate recovery.
6️⃣ Governance Lens
Cross-border CNP transactions test:
- Fraud
monitoring systems
- Authentication
controls
- Notification
speed
- Dispute
workflows
- Audit
trail clarity
Where issuer and distributor are distinct, clarity becomes
critical:
- Where
is the dispute filed?
- Who
provides provisional credit?
- Who
communicates the outcome?
In such moments, strength lies not in speed — but in
structured accountability.
When One Country Sleeps
It may have been mid-morning in Brazil.
Gateways active.
Merchants transacting.
In India, it was past midnight.
A phone screen lit up.
An SMS.
A foreign currency debit.
A transaction crossed oceans — without the cardholder moving.
Geography has dissolved.
Money travels faster than awareness.
And within that speed, there must be a pause.
That pause is the chargeback.
Not confrontation.
Not spectacle.
But a checkpoint.
A mechanism that asks:
Was this authorised?
Was this intended?
Does this align with consent?
In cross-border, card-not-present environments, trust is
maintained not by assumption — but by design.
By defined pathways.
By timelines that protect the consumer.
By audit trails that retrace digital journeys.
The time difference between India and Brazil is 8½ hours.
But the distance between transaction and accountability should be far smaller.
The quiet strength of safe digital payments is the assurance
that accountability travels with the transaction.
Disclaimer
This article provides an analytical overview of chargeback
mechanisms in cross-border card environments, based on publicly available
reporting.
It does not allege confirmed breach, assign liability, or
constitute legal advice. Cardholders should contact their issuing bank for
case-specific guidance.
The Joy of Digital Transactions
Nayakanti Prashant
Citizen Advocate — Digital Transaction Day (April 11)
“Let’s make April 11 a global symbol of care — in payments, in
protection, in progress.”
👉 https://movethebarrier.blogspot.com/April11
