adsense

Sunday, January 29, 2012

Is it time for 3FA(Factor Authentication) in Indian ATM's?



The trigger for this thought is this article Economic Times article
It seems the speakers at the Meet, have a very strong mindset to blame the bankers especially bankers associated with ATM Operations for the fake notes menace.

Maybe the Speakers have not read this article Security Features of Indian Notes

The aim of this article is not to explain what is 1FA(factor authentication) or 2FA(factor authentication) or 3FA(factor authentication) but to analyze the pros and cons of 3FA(factor authentication)

3FA(factor authentication), in simple terms is the verification of the 'User's request' by three separate steps to conform that the 'request' has been raised by the correct user only and not by any 3rd party.

3FA is not 100% secure, but 99.9999% secure. Nothing in this world is 100% secure.
ATM's in India, currently have 2FA I.e 'something which a user has – ATM card' and 'something which the user knows – PIN (Personal Identification Number)

There is a wide choice for the 3rd FA(factor authentication),
  1. Biometric (UIDAI being the best example) or
  2. OTP (One time password)
  3. Security Tokens or
  4. Card Lock-in options
  5. Transaction Authentication

The Pros and Cons of each option in brief are us under :

  1. Biometric (UIDAI being the best example)--
PROS :
a) Tools exist to make this reality.

CONS:
a) UIDAI is yet to stabilize.
b) The implementation and the maintenance costs right now are substantial.
  1. Biometric verfication tools on a large scale are not common in India.


  1. OTP (One time password)--
PROS: -
a) OTP's are becoming common.
b) The implementation and maintenance costs are less

CONS: -
a) OTP features need to be integrated into the ATM network. This is not a big inhibitor as majority of the ATM's are part of the NFS (National Financial Switch) network now. The only factor which might be a stumbling block is the validity time period of the OTP generated I.e for how many hours the OTP generated should be live. Currently the industry average is 2 hours for netbanking non-financial OTP's.
For financial OTP's the life is few seconds.

  1. Security Tokens--
PROS:
a) Proven technology
b) Costs are less

CONS:
a) Integration with the ATM's network required.
b) Who will bear the cost of the Security token?

  1. Card Lock-in Options--
In simple terms, the Card Locking feature means allowing Bank consumers the option to lock and unlock their bank cards to permit or deny account use at automated teller machines (ATMs) and point-of-sale (POS) devices or on internet sites.
Some Banks have already opted for this feature. Check out at Card Lockin, Diebold cardlock in feature
PROS:-
a) Brand new concept, hence to encourage Banks to hop on to the bandwagon.
b) SMS/Branch/Phone/Net Banking channels can be multiple-touch points for this option.

      1. Transaction Authentication. Transaction authentication means using an additional electronic signature generated on the basis of the amount to be withdrawn from the ATM. The electronic signature can be a OTP which is generated only after the amount tobe withdrawn is keyed into the ATM. However, the main draw back is that the time-frame to complete the whole cycle of ATM withdrawal is short and introducing Transaction Authentication in the present setup is a challenge.







No comments:

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Disclaimer

The thoughts in this BLOG are personal, and reflect only my view on the subject.
This are not the views of my Employers.
All images, logos rights rest with the Original TitleHolders

All efforts have been made to make this information as accurate as possible, N Prashant will not be responsible for any loss to any person caused by inaccuracy in the information available on this Website. Relevent Official Gazettes Communications may be consulted for an accurate information. Any discrepancy found may be brought to the notice of N Prashant