adsense

Showing posts with label SEBI. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SEBI. Show all posts

Thursday, September 17, 2026

Citizen Observation 45 of 777 | UPI MDR | SEBI HEARS THE BROKERS | WHO WILL HEAR THE COMMON CITIZEN?

 Published 17 th September 2026

Nayakanti Prashant
3rd Gen Banker & Citizen Lobbyist – Bengaluru

https://in.linkedin.com/in/prashantnayakanti

 

1. The INTRO

A policy framework can affect different stakeholders in different ways.

When a stakeholder identifies a concern, raises it with the appropriate authority and receives a response, that becomes part of the policy conversation.

Stockbrokers have raised concerns. SEBI has said it will examine those concerns.

But this raises a broader question:

If the concerns of brokers can reach the regulator, can the concerns of the common citizen also reach the policy table?

This Citizen Observation is not about questioning whether brokers should be heard.

They should.

It is about asking whether the common citizen should also have a visible avenue to place a measurable policy suggestion before the decision-makers.

And this time, the suggestion is not merely a question.

It comes with a number.


2. THE TRIGGER

The immediate trigger for CO45 is the reported response of SEBI Chairman Tuhin Kanta Pandey to concerns raised by stockbrokers regarding the new UPI MDR framework.

Pandey said that SEBI would examine the issues raised by brokers and look at how they could be eased.

The significance for this Citizen Observation is not whether the broker concerns are ultimately accepted.

The significance is the policy-feedback mechanism:

Concern raised → Regulator responds → Issue gets examined.

That is an important part of how policy can evolve.

But it also provides an opportunity to ask a citizen-facing question:

What happens when the common citizen has a concern?

The UPI MDR framework is not merely a technical payment-system change. The structure of thresholds and charges can influence how different participants experience the digital-payment ecosystem.

So, alongside stakeholder concerns, can there also be room for a simple, measurable citizen suggestion?

CO45 attempts to place one on the table.


3. PROSPECTIVE AUDIENCE

This observation is deliberately addressed to three audiences:

PMO — Decision Maker

The primary audience for placing the citizen proposal at the policy level.

SEBI — Interested Party

SEBI is directly relevant to this conversation because its Chairman has publicly responded to concerns raised by stockbrokers regarding UPI MDR.

Common Citizen — Most Affected Party

The citizen is not merely an observer of the policy conversation.

The citizen is one of the participants whose everyday digital-payment behaviour is shaped by the framework.

Prospective Audience: PMO | SEBI | The Common Citizen

And the central question remains:

SEBI hears the brokers.
Who will hear the common citizen?


4. ABOUT THE ISSUE

The new UPI MDR framework introduces differentiated treatment for certain Person-to-Merchant (P2M) transactions.

Under the framework, specified P2M UPI transactions up to ₹2,000 remain outside MDR, while transactions above ₹2,000 attract MDR according to the applicable category. The framework is scheduled to take effect from 15 October 2026.

The ₹2,000 threshold therefore becomes an important reference point.

But a threshold created at one point in time does not necessarily remain equally relevant as transaction values change.

This is where CO44 raised the first citizen question:

IF THE BASKET GROWS, CAN THE FREE SLAB GROW TOO?

CO44 proposed:

₹2,000 → ₹2,100 → ₹2,200 → …

CO45 takes that thought one step further.

Rather than beginning the annual progression from ₹2,000, could the threshold first be reset to ₹2,500 when the new framework comes into effect?

And thereafter:

₹2,500 → ₹2,600 → ₹2,700 → ₹2,800 → …

with an annual increase of ₹100 every October.

The proposal is deliberately simple.

It does not attempt to redesign the entire UPI MDR framework.

It asks whether the starting point itself can be reconsidered, followed by a predictable annual adjustment.

CO44 asked whether the slab can grow.
CO45 asks whether the slab should first be reset — and then allowed to grow.

This is not presented as the only possible answer.

It is one measurable option placed before the decision-makers for consideration.


5. ONE MEASURABLE SUGGESTION

Reset the Slab. Then Let It Grow.

New Delhi. September 2026.

A concern has been placed on the table.

Stockbrokers have raised concerns about UPI MDR.

At the policy table, SEBI Chairman Tuhin Kanta Pandey has said that SEBI will examine those concerns and see how they can be eased.

Now, imagine another voice entering that same policy conversation.

Not a broker.

Not an industry association.

A common citizen.

And instead of arriving with a complaint, the citizen arrives with one number, one date and one simple mechanism.

₹2,500.

The citizen suggestion:

Reset the UPI MDR free slab from ₹2,000 to ₹2,500 from October 2026.

Then let it move predictably:

₹2,500 → ₹2,600 → ₹2,700 → ₹2,800 → ₹2,900 → …

with ₹100 added every October.

October

Proposed Slab

2026

₹2,500

2027

₹2,600

2028

₹2,700

2029

₹2,800

2030

₹2,900

Thereafter

+₹100 every October

Why this suggestion?

Because the citizen is not asking for an open-ended exemption or a complicated new mechanism.

The proposal has:

A number — ₹2,500
A date — October 2026
An increment — ₹100
A frequency — every October

The annual increment can be reviewed by the appropriate authorities if circumstances warrant a different approach.

So the proposal is not presented as the only answer.

It is one concrete option placed before the decision-makers — to accept, modify or reject.

And here is the citizen's moment at the table:

The brokers have placed their concern.
SEBI has said it will hear them.

Here is the common citizen's proposal.

₹2,500 now.
₹100 more every October.

One number. One date. One predictable path.


6. READY-TO-USE SOLUTION

RESET → INDEX → REVIEW

RESET

₹2,000 → ₹2,500 from October 2026

INDEX

₹2,500 → ₹2,600 → ₹2,700 → ₹2,800 → ₹2,900 → …

+ ₹100 every October

REVIEW

The mechanism can be reviewed periodically by the appropriate authorities and modified if circumstances warrant.

One simple mechanism. One measurable citizen option.


7. WHY IT HELPS

A predictable annual adjustment could provide:

Predictability — a clearly defined annual movement.

Transparency — the adjustment is visible rather than requiring a fresh policy discussion each time.

Simplicity — one number, one annual increment and one review mechanism.

Citizen participation — a general concern becomes a specific policy option.

It does not assume that ₹2,500 or ₹100 is permanently correct.

It simply places a measurable option before the appropriate decision-makers:

Consider it. Modify it. Or reject it.

But let the citizen proposal be heard.


8. CLOSING THOUGHT

SEBI HEARS THE BROKERS.
WHO WILL HEAR THE COMMON CITIZEN?

A stakeholder raised a concern.

The concern reached the regulator.

The regulator said it would examine the issue.

Now the common citizen places a different kind of concern on the table — not merely a complaint, but a measurable suggestion.

₹2,500 from October 2026.
₹100 more every October thereafter.

If stakeholders can put their concerns on the table, can the common citizen's concern have a seat at the same table?


9. THE WHITEBOARD

THE BROKERS BROUGHT A CONCERN.

THE CITIZEN BRINGS A NUMBER.

₹2,500 → ₹2,600 → ₹2,700 → ₹2,800 → …

+ ₹100 EVERY OCTOBER


10. DISCLAIMER

Citizen Observation 777 is intended to start conversations, not conclude them.

This proposal is offered purely from a citizen's perspective and may be accepted, modified, reviewed or rejected by the appropriate authorities based on wider policy considerations.

A beginning has to be made, and this is the beginning.


11. APRIL 11 — DIGITAL TRANSACTIONS DAY

April 11 — Digital Transactions Day

UPI began its beta journey on April 11, 2016.

Digital payments are shaped not only by transactions, but also by the rules and choices that govern them.

CO45 is one small citizen suggestion in that continuing journey:

As there seem to be opportunities for stakeholders to put forward their suggestions, this is one small step towards that.

As of now, I am not sure what shape this will take, but the prayer for the limit to be increased to ₹2,500/- will continue.

Listen to the stakeholders. Hear the citizen. Keep improving the system.

The guide for Citizen Observation 45 is Chapter 2, Verse 47 of the Bhagavad Gita, where Lord Krishna tells Arjuna that you have a right to do your work, but you do not control the results.

The only Joy is —

The Joy of Digital Transactions

Advocating Digital Transactions Day (April 11)

This version retains your important distinction: the proposal is being pursued with effort, but without claiming control over the outcome.

 

The Joy of Digital Transactions

Nayakanti Prashant
3rd Gen Banker & Citizen Lobbyist – Bengaluru
Advocating Digital Transactions Day (April 11)

Author’s Blogs

https://prashantrandomthoughts.blogspot.com
https://prashantnepayments.blogspot.com
https://innovationinbanking.blogspot.com

 


Thursday, August 20, 2026

Citizen Observation 31 of 777 | SEBI Closing Auction Session | Same 20 Minutes. Different Liquidity Journeys. Can They Be Seen?

 Published 20th August, 2026

The final 20 minutes are the same. Can we see how the journey changes each day?

Nayakanti Prashant
3rd Gen Banker & Citizen Lobbyist – Bengaluru

 

The Starting Point

Dear SEBI and Exchange Teams,

The market now has a new closing chapter.

From 3:15 PM to 3:35 PM, the Closing Auction Session creates a concentrated journey towards the closing price.

The closing price matters far beyond the final traded price — influencing index calculations, fund valuations and derivatives settlement.

Now imagine 3:15 PM.

In Mumbai, an institutional desk watches.

In GIFT City, another market participant watches.

In Bengaluru, an individual investor watches.

Different participants.

Different questions.

One 20-minute window.

The window is the same every market day.

The journey may not be.

What if that changing journey could be seen through one simple daily visual picture?


Act I — The Same Clock. A Different Journey.

It is 3:35 PM.

The closing picture has emerged.

But what happened between 3:15 and 3:35?

One day may show strong participation.

Another may show a different volume pattern.

Another may show a larger imbalance.

The clock remains the same.

The journey changes.

And perhaps the market already produces signals capable of telling that story.

Can the journey of those signals become visible too?


Prospective Audience — Different Eyes. Different Questions.

In Mumbai, a fund manager could see how participation shaped the closing journey.

In GIFT City, a trading desk could watch how the auction behaved across trading days.

In Bengaluru, a researcher could look for patterns emerging over time.

In Delhi, a market-policy or surveillance team could view the same aggregated picture from another perspective.

And somewhere else in India, an individual investor may simply ask:

“What actually happened during those final 20 minutes?”

Different places.

Different purposes.

One common daily picture.

The picture need not tell anyone what to conclude.

Perhaps it simply needs to make the changing journey visible.

Illustrative only.

 

Act II — The Journey Behind the Number

The market reaches 3:15 PM.

For the next 20 minutes, the auction unfolds.

Orders enter.

Signals change.

Liquidity gathers.

Imbalances may appear.

And eventually, an equilibrium closing price emerges.

Today’s journey may look different from yesterday’s.

Tomorrow’s may look different again.

But once the session ends, much of the attention naturally moves to the final number.

Perhaps the more interesting citizen question is:

What happened on the way to that number?

 

Act III — One Journey. Many Daily Pictures.

Imagine opening a simple daily view after the market closes.

Not a prediction.

Not a recommendation.

Not another trading dashboard.

Just the journey.

3:15 PM → 3:20 PM → 3:25 PM → 3:30 PM → 3:35 PM

Perhaps the view could show selected aggregate signals at each stage.

One day, the journey may appear relatively smooth.

Another day, participation may build differently.

Another may show a more pronounced imbalance.

The important point is not to create a new interpretation of the market.

It is to preserve the same visual framework every day, so that the changing journey can be seen over time.

Same clock.

Different journey.

One common visual language.


Act IV — One Citizen Illustration

Perhaps an aggregate end-of-day public view could look as straightforward as this:

 

Session

Aggregate Volume

Total Value (₹ Cr)

Journey View

Continuous Market

XXXXXXX

XXXXX

—

CAS — Order Entry

XXXXXXX

XXXXX

XXXXX

CAS — Matching

XXXXXXX

XXXXX

XXXXX

Closing Picture

XXXXXXX

XXXXX

XXXXX

 

Illustrative example only.

Perhaps the visual could also show the journey:

3:15 PM → 3:20 PM → 3:25 PM → 3:30 PM → 3:35 PM

with selected aggregate signals plotted along the way.

The actual fields, definitions, data schema, aggregation, frequency and safeguards would naturally belong to SEBI, the exchanges and market-infrastructure domain experts.

The citizen observation is simple:

If the closing mechanism is digital and the signals already exist, can the daily journey also become visible?

Because the final number tells us where the market arrived.

The journey could help us see how it got there.

Illustrative only.

The citizen observation is simply:

If every market day produces a 20-minute CAS journey, could that journey also leave behind one consistent daily visual picture?

Because the final number tells us where we arrived.

Perhaps the journey can tell us how we got there.

Illustrative only.

One Citizen Thought

The market already has its mechanisms.

The exchanges already generate the data.

Perhaps the opportunity is simply to make the journey easier to see over time.

The clock repeats.
The journey does not.

Not just a singular post-market total, but a simple visual narrative of the session's journey.


The First Line on the Whiteboard

The clock repeats. The liquidity journey does not. Let us see it!


A Citizen Observation

Could the exchanges, in an appropriate aggregated format, consider a daily visual journey of the Closing Auction Session?

Not a prediction.

Not a recommendation.

Simply a consistent visual picture of selected aggregate signals across 3:15 PM–3:35 PM.

The methodology, data points, aggregation, safeguards and implementation are best left to SEBI, the exchanges and domain experts.

Same 20 minutes. Different journeys. One visible picture.


Closing Thought

At 3:15 PM, the journey begins.

At 3:35 PM, the closing picture emerges.

Perhaps we should  see the journey too.


Disclaimer

This is a citizen observation based on publicly available information about SEBI's Closing Auction Session framework.

It is not financial, investment, trading, legal or regulatory advice.

All visual examples and suggested fields are illustrative. Actual methodology, data, aggregation, safeguards and implementation remain with SEBI, the exchanges and relevant domain experts.


April 11 — Digital Transactions Day

Every digital journey leaves signals behind.

Start → Progress → Complete → Observe → Learn

Perhaps the opportunity is not merely to digitise the journey.

It is to make the journey visible.

The Joy of Digital Transactions

 

The Joy of Digital Transactions

Nayakanti Prashant
3rd Gen Banker & Citizen Lobbyist – Bengaluru
Advocating Digital Transactions Day (April 11)

Author’s Blogs

https://prashantrandomthoughts.blogspot.com
https://prashantnepayments.blogspot.com
https://innovationinbanking.blogspot.com



Wednesday, July 15, 2026

Citizen Observation 1 of 777 | Dear SEBI, A COMMA Is Not a Special Character

 Published: July 15, 2026

CO 1 of 777

Three Days. Five Responses. Thousands of Characters. One Small Observation.

 

Public consultations are among the most meaningful ways in which citizens can contribute to better public policy.

 

Could enabling secure copy and paste together with commonly used punctuation such as commas make the consultation process more citizen-friendly while preserving appropriate validation and security controls?

 Sometimes, improving regulation begins by improving the conversation around regulation.

 Author: Nayakanti Prashant

3rd Gen Banker & Citizen Lobbyist – Bengaluru

Advocating Digital Transactions Day (April 11)



 Over the last three days, I participated in SEBI's public consultation on the proposed Common Advertisement Code.

 

The consultation itself was thoughtful.

 

It encouraged stakeholders to think deeply about investor protection, virtual characters, digital communication and technology-enabled supervision.

 

The portal experience, however, led me to one small citizen observation.

 

Several commonly used punctuation marks, including the comma , could not be typed directly into the comment fields.

 

Ironically, my grammar tool occasionally suggested corrections and inserted a comma  automatically.

 

I accepted those suggestions sparingly because I genuinely did not know whether the final submission might later be rejected for containing a character that contributors themselves were unable to type.

 

A comma is not merely punctuation.

 

It separates ideas.

 

It improves readability.

 

It reduces ambiguity.

 

Most importantly, it helps the reader understand the contributor's intent.

 

Public consultations invite citizens to spend hours researching, refining and validating their recommendations.

 

The effort should ideally be invested in improving ideas rather than manually reproducing them under avoidable interface constraints.

 

One small enhancement for future consultations could therefore be to permit secure copy-and-paste functionality together with commonly used punctuation marks such as comma s while continuing to block characters that genuinely present security or validation concerns.

 

In many cases, the manual transcription effort may exceed the time spent developing the actual recommendations.

 

That is time that could otherwise be invested in producing better public policy inputs.

 

As someone who advocates Digital Transactions Day on April 11, I often say that Digital Payments are only a subset of Digital Transactions.

 

In the same spirit, a public consultation is more than a web form.

 

It is a digital transaction between a citizen and a regulator.

 

The easier it is to contribute thoughtfully, the stronger that transaction becomes.

 

Sometimes, the smallest improvements create the biggest participation.

 

Disclaimer

 

This article reflects my personal experience while participating in SEBI's public consultation process and is intended as a constructive citizen observation. The views expressed are my own. Artificial Intelligence was used as a research, drafting and language assistance tool. The analysis, observations and responsibility for this article remain entirely mine.

 

Every trusted digital transaction begins with a trusted digital interaction.

All roads lead to April 11 – Digital Transactions Day.

Please note that Digital Payments are a subset of Digital Transactions.

The Joy of Digital Transactions

Nayakanti Prashant
3rd Gen Banker & Citizen Lobbyist – Bengaluru
Advocating Digital Transactions Day (April 11)

 

Author’s Blogs

https://prashantrandomthoughts.blogspot.com
https://prashantnepayments.blogspot.com
https://innovationinbanking.blogspot.com

 

 

 

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Disclaimer

The thoughts in this BLOG are personal, and reflect only my view on the subject.
This are not the views of my Employers.
All images, logos rights rest with the Original TitleHolders

All efforts have been made to make this information as accurate as possible, N Prashant will not be responsible for any loss to any person caused by inaccuracy in the information available on this Website. Relevent Official Gazettes Communications may be consulted for an accurate information. Any discrepancy found may be brought to the notice of N Prashant