adsense

Wednesday, September 29, 2010

NEFT closed on 30th September, 2010 – 2nd October, 2010 – 3rd October, 2010 RTGS closed on 30th September, 2010 – 2nd October, 2010 – 3rd October, 2010


RTGS/NEFT closed on 30th September, 2010 – 2nd October, 2010 – 3rd October, 2010

30th September 2010  – Half-yearly closing of Bank Books

02nd October 2010 – Gandhi Jayanti

03rd October 2010 - Sunday

Folks plan your ePayments carefully today. Any wrong information, will lead to delayed receipt of funds at either ends.
Yes, the stretch holidays were known in Advance, but the Sunday in between will result in a huge pile up of transactions today i.e 29th septemeber, 2010 and also on Monday i.e 04th October, 2010
Enhanced by Zemanta

Dispute Resolution Mechanism under the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007





Dispute Resolution Mechanism under the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007

As the numbers of transactions in the Payment Systems are on the increase, it is but natural that the complaints too should rise.

A number of complaints found their way to Reserve Bank of India, DPSS for an amicable solution.

To bring in Uniformity and transparency amongst the Dispute Settlements, RBI DPSS has issued detailed guidelines.

The same can be accessed @


The relevant Notification Number is:  RBI/2010-11/213/DPSS.CO.CHD.No.654/03.01.03/2010-2011 dt.         September 24, 2010





QUOTE

01) Scope of the Dispute Resolution Mechanism will generally be limited to interpretation, scrutiny and resolution of disputes within the ambit of rules, regulations, operational and procedural guidelines relating to the payment products, various instructions issued by the system providers, instructions and directions issued by RBI, etc., from time to time.


02) Use of the mechanism will not be resorted
a) to deal with aspects relating to acts of system participants (or providers) that are prima-facie fraudulent or
b) are internal to their operations or
c) outside the payment and settlement system infrastructure.


03) The Dispute Resolution Mechanism will also not cover disputes
a) between system participants and their customers (ultimate users),
b) between members of the payment systems and their sub-members
c) or between sub-members themselves.



UNQUOTE


The highlights of this Notification are:-

The various products under the Payments and Settlement Systems are divided into 3 broad areas viz:-

a) Clearing House-related activities, including paper (cheques) and retail electronic (ECS) payment products

b) Products those are national in character viz. National Electronic Clearing Service (NECS), National Electronic Funds Transfer (NEFT) and Real Time Gross Settlement (RTGS) system

c) All other payment systems (other than those operated by RBI) like CCIL, NPCI, ATM networks, cross border money transfers, cards, etc.

The PRD (Panel for Resolution of Disputes) should dispose of the dispute, within 15 working days of receiving the same.

Likewise, the Appellate authority too has to dispose of the Appeals, within 15 working days.


            The Dispute Resolution mechanism should lead to greater understanding of the functioning of the Payments and Settlements Act 2007, amongst all the state-holders. As more and more Disputes are resolved, the efficiency of the Payments System will increase. This will attract new customers and new transactions, into the Payment Systems ambit.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, September 26, 2010

Cheque Truncation System – 2010 – (CTS 2010) Guidance Note by National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI)





Cheque Truncation System – 2010 – (CTS 2010) Guidance Note by National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI)

As the deadline for CTS-2010, is coming closer, the various stake-holders are getting their act together
As per RBI Notification No RBI/2009-10/323/DPSS.CO.CHD.No.1832/04.07.05/2009-10  dt.February 22, 2010, IBA(Indian Banks Association) and NPCI, are the coordinating agencies, for CTS - 2010.
Towards this end, NPCI has on 21st September, 2010 issued a Guidance Note for the roll-out.

The complete Guidance Note can be accessed at


The highlights of the Guidance Note are :



Orders placed by Banks for Cheque Forms, on or after 01/10/2010, must  comply with CTS – 2010 Security features
The Security features contain Mandatory features as well as Optional features

The Mandatory Security features are : -
A) Water Mark (to be incorporated at the paper manufacturing stage)

B) Void Pantograph ( at printing stage)

C)Ultra-violet logo of Bank(at printing stage)

D) Standardized field placements of a cheque

E) Cheque printing colours and background.

F) Microlettering.

G) New Rupee Symbol at CAR (Courtesy Amount Recognition) amount in figure field.

H) Printer Name along with CTS – 2010


Optional Features:-  These are optional features based on the Banks risk perception.

(i) Supplementary watermark containing their own logo  - - - A watermark is a recognizable image or pattern in paper that appears as various shades of lightness/darkness when viewed by transmitted light (or when viewed by reflected light, atop a dark background), caused by thickness or density variations in the paper

(ii) Embedded fluorescent fibres, - - - Invisible colored fluorescent fibres are embedded into the paper during the manufacturing process. The fibres are invisible to the naked eye, but become visible when viewed under an ultra violet lamp. This can be placed at random locations or at pre-determined locations on the Cheque forms.


(iii) fugitive ink, - - - Water fugitive ink is sensitive with most liquid solutions and will smear and stain the document.  Most official stamps uses water fugitive inks (McGraw-Hill, 2007).  This security feature makes it apparent if a document has been altered.


(iv) secondary fluorescent ink, - - - Fluorescent inks are naturally bright inks that reflect and emit light making use of UV light waves, which other inks cannot take advantage of.


(v) Toner fusing - - - Toner Fuse Technology causes Laser Toner to bond permanently to the paper surface. This covert security feature makes it impossible to "lift" words and numbers off the surface of the paper using adhesive tape, without destroying the paper surface.


(vi) check- sum.


(vii) Patterns


(vii) Floral designs


(ix) bleeding ink, - - - An option of bleeding ink could be implemented on a cheque which makes fraud impossible using any water based chemicals, if applied to the cheque a colored solvent reacts and spoils the cheque.  


(x) Structural magnetic security thread


(xii) Hot stamped holograms on multi-city cheques and demand drafts


(xiii) auto-detection tools


(xiv) Use of UV band on sensitive and  key areas of interest on a cheque such as Legal Amount Recognition (Amount in Words), Courtesy Amount Recognition (Amount in Figures), Signature, Beneficiary Name


(xv) pre-encoding of amount field on the MICR band for demand drafts / pay orders (above a self-decided cut-off) before issue to customers


(xvi) Use of check-sum on the face of demand drafts / pay orders (other than the MICR band), etc.


NPCI has advised banks that the additional security features adhere to CTS – 2010 specifications and also not Image heavy.

The deadline for implementation of the CTS 2010 standards is 31/12/2010.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          One of the interesting aspect of this Guidance Note is that the CTS 2010 Specifications are applicable to all Cheque forms, and not only for Cheques forms for branches under the CTS (Cheque Truncation System) locations.

This might be to ensure that the Speed Clearing process does not get de-railed and also to ensure uniformity amongst the Cheque forms, in our country.

As the INR symbol has been adopted, this also is finding place on the new Cheque Forms.

I guess the next Guidance note will be on the transition period for existing Cheque Forms, already in the financial system. As it is, still Non-MICR cheques are being issued by few Government Departments.
------------------------------------------------------------
Another fascinating facet of this Guidance Note, is that the testing fee of Rs1000/- per Cheque Form Batch is to be remitted by Payorder/Demand Draft, and through NEFT.
Yes, I would have preferred the testing fees through NEFT rather than Pay Order/Demand Draft.






Enhanced by Zemanta

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Disclaimer

The thoughts in this BLOG are personal, and reflect only my view on the subject.
This are not the views of my Employers.
All images, logos rights rest with the Original TitleHolders

All efforts have been made to make this information as accurate as possible, N Prashant will not be responsible for any loss to any person caused by inaccuracy in the information available on this Website. Relevent Official Gazettes Communications may be consulted for an accurate information. Any discrepancy found may be brought to the notice of N Prashant